Cite This For Me: Web Citer
User Reviews
Evelyn Zhang
2022-01-03
Save my life lol |
Kareem Baba
2021-12-15
Half of the time, the details aren't correct, despite the original author and actual publication date being explicitly displayed at the top of the articles. I'd rather manually type the reference as editing the given reference wastes more time. Furthermore, roughly 35% of the time, the extension is ineligible to cite a website. |
MARSHALL
2021-11-06
hasta el momento a podido citarme las paginas que he abierto, :D |
Alejandro Alvarez Londoño
2021-10-20
it´s wonderful!!! |
Jurij Fedorov
2021-10-18
Wrong format. It auto creates a citation using proper info from the website, but this is not standard and not useful for serious use. |
monabano
2021-09-19
Not a single accurate cite..very disappointed! |
̇j
2021-07-04
bruh i cant even go to refme.com it redirects. i'd wish you luck with failing but you don't even need any. |
Trebor_The_Protogent VODS
2021-05-12
Does what it's supposed to do, works with a lot of websites, definitely deserves 5 stars |
Chmm
2021-04-12
I have found that for school work we see no issue using the citations that it has created for me in the past. However sometimes it does leave out information so if you want to be 100% sure of your citations you still might want to enter the information manually. |
Alaska Faulle
2021-03-29
It does the job but it freezes sometimes, the interface is very ugly and it cites in a weird almost inaccurate way. I'll look at alternatives, but it's so annoying to use I would choose doing everything myself over using that. I know it's not very nice but I don't know how to say that without sounding rude. Also, the whole situation with the precedent extension is suspicious. |
