Wiki-Ads Wiki-Ads

Social & Communication
Version: 1.0.1
Last Update: 2014-02-25

Overview

Wiki-Ads is a Chrome extension developed by Wiki-Ads. According to the data from Chrome web store, current version of Wiki-Ads is 1.0.1, updated on 2014-02-25.
21 users have installed this extension. 5 users have rated this extension with an average rating of .
developer website: wiki-ads.com

Donate to Wikipedia by viewing advertisements when you visit it.

Wikipedia depends on users' donations to survive. Now you can donate just by installing this extension and browsing Wikipedia. This extension adds tasteful Amazon.com advertisements to Wikipedia pages. When you purchase an item through these ads, Amazon pays a commission to Wiki-Ads, and we donate 100% of these profits to Wikipedia.

This extension only runs when you're on Wikipedia.org, so it won't affect any other webpages in any way.

Note: If you have an ad blocker installed, you have to configure it to exclude wikipedia.org.

Rating

5 ratings

Total Installs

21

Information

Last Update

2014-02-25

Current Version

1.0.1

Size

7.84KiB

Author

Wiki-Ads

Website

wiki-ads.com

Category

Social & Communication

Latest Reviews

See More

avatar Mika Norén
2018-02-12

Wikipedia itself does not support advertising through or on the Wikipedia web site or any of its articles.

I do wonder, how do they then receive the ad revenues from something they don't support or stand behind?

To me it looks like someone else is getting the revenue on behalf of wikipedia. If that is the case, it is a nasty exploitation.

avatar Clément Fontaine
2016-06-07

Fallacieux ! Cette extension n'est pas affiliée à la wikimédia foundation

avatar Todd Schiller
2014-01-02

So good that I installed it twice!

avatar Justin Cherveny
2013-12-31

Works perfectly. I had to disable ad-blocker, which I will only do for wikipedia. They should feel special.

avatar Mika Norén
2018-02-12

Wikipedia itself does not support advertising through or on the Wikipedia web site or any of its articles.

I do wonder, how do they then receive the ad revenues from something they don't support or stand behind?

To me it looks like someone else is getting the revenue on behalf of wikipedia. If that is the case, it is a nasty exploitation.