Wikipedia + Cochrane Library
Overview
Wikipedia + Cochrane Library is a Chrome extension developed by arash.joorabchi.
According to the data from Chrome web store, current version of Wikipedia + Cochrane Library is 1.1, updated on 2019-09-08.
115 users have installed this extension.
1 users have rated this extension with an average rating of .
developer website: sciscanner.com
Linking Wikipedia articles to Cochrane reviews
The extension activates when browsing Wikipedia. If the Wikipedia article which is being viewed is classified as a disease, then a list of relevant Cochrane reviews will be displayed.
Wikipedia + Cochrane Library Alternatives
Name | Category | Rating | Rating Count | Installs |
---|---|---|---|---|
WikiCopy | Productivity | (2) | 140 | |
mHealth Search | Search Tools | (1) | 172 | |
HONcode Toolbar | Search Tools | (11) | 7,000+ | |
Medict | Search Tools | (0) | 53 | |
Save to Gentle Reader | News & Weather | (1) | 15 | |
StudyWidget Chrome Extension | Productivity | (0) | 62 | |
Qotter Copy & Show | Accessibility | (0) | 27 | |
FibonacciMD | Productivity | (1) | 71 | |
Tabrary (Beta) | Productivity | (1) | 25 | |
WikiShark Wikipedia Statistics | Social & Communication | (3) | 73 | |
Wikipedia-Interlink | Productivity | (2) | 67 | |
Lazy Scholar | Search Tools | (63) | 10,000+ | |
Qwikipedia | Productivity | (2) | 51 | |
SimpleMarker | Productivity | (8) | 46 | |
SheetAside | Productivity | (2) | 36 | |
High Wiki | Fun | (1) | 94 | |
Med Study Pop-up by Picmonic | Productivity | (11) | 1,000+ | |
Scite | Productivity | (22) | 60,000+ | |
Context | Productivity | (2) | 134 | |
Side Portal | Productivity | (4) | 236 | |
Wiki Preview | Productivity | (7) | 131 | |
Wiki Readifyer | Accessibility | (6) | 187 | |
Daily Health Tips | News & Weather | (4) | 68 | |
Easy Wikipedia | Search Tools | (1) | 177 |
Latest Reviews
See More
Ivan D. Florez
2019-12-30
Nice resource. It works (With high sensitivity) for identifying reviews that mention the disease. However, as I said it has very high sensitivity, ie, it includes a list of many Cochrane reviews that just mention the disease. I t would be good to make it more specific focusing on the "population" of the review, and retrieving reviews that only mention the disease in the Population or the outcomes. |
Ivan D. Florez
2019-12-30
Nice resource. It works (With high sensitivity) for identifying reviews that mention the disease. However, as I said it has very high sensitivity, ie, it includes a list of many Cochrane reviews that just mention the disease. I t would be good to make it more specific focusing on the "population" of the review, and retrieving reviews that only mention the disease in the Population or the outcomes. |
Ivan D. Florez
2019-12-30
Nice resource. It works (With high sensitivity) for identifying reviews that mention the disease. However, as I said it has very high sensitivity, ie, it includes a list of many Cochrane reviews that just mention the disease. I t would be good to make it more specific focusing on the "population" of the review, and retrieving reviews that only mention the disease in the Population or the outcomes. |
Ivan D. Florez
2019-12-30
Nice resource. It works (With high sensitivity) for identifying reviews that mention the disease. However, as I said it has very high sensitivity, ie, it includes a list of many Cochrane reviews that just mention the disease. I t would be good to make it more specific focusing on the "population" of the review, and retrieving reviews that only mention the disease in the Population or the outcomes. |
Ivan D. Florez
2019-12-30
Nice resource. It works (With high sensitivity) for identifying reviews that mention the disease. However, as I said it has very high sensitivity, ie, it includes a list of many Cochrane reviews that just mention the disease. I t would be good to make it more specific focusing on the "population" of the review, and retrieving reviews that only mention the disease in the Population or the outcomes. |